I’m all for putting solar panels all over the place, but won’t these get dusty and oily and need loads of cleaning after trains pass over?

Also, costing €623,000 over three years sounds rather expensive for just 100m (although that roughly equates to 11KW).

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
23 points

This is Switzerland, not India. Also, it’s a test. It’s designed to find out exactly how serious those problems are and if they prevent the system from being effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Next test: solar panels on the bottom of the ocean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Cause those things are similar!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Putting solar panels between rails is as stupid as solar roadways. There is nothing to be gained and just lots of hurdles to overcome to make it (almost) as good as a normal solar panel on a roof or on a stick or on a wall.

Tell me, why on earth would you put solar panels between rails?

Edit: lot of anger here, but no answers why the panels should go between the rails, shaken daily by heavy trains. You invested in it or what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Subnautica entered the chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Is this the same bunch of people that wanted to make solar roads/bike lanes too?

I could see a solar road working with some kind of passive heating medium circulated underneath but even then, the maintenance on that would be a nightmare. We can barely maintain all the roads we have already, and that’s just goopy rocks and grading.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Green Energy

!energy@slrpnk.net

Create post

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 1K

    Monthly active users

  • 823

    Posts

  • 3.6K

    Comments