You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
152 points

This will get RISC-V probably a big boost. Maybe this was not the smartest move for ARMs long term future. But slapping Qualcomm is always a good idea, its just such a shitty company.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

You are overestimating RISC-V. It cannot save the planet alone.

ARM provides complete chip designs.

RISC-V is more like an API, and then you still need to design your chips behind it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Of course i will still take RISC-V a long time to be even relevant. But in the future there could be multiple Companies that offer finished chip designs to use. As you said not every company wants and can create a design themself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

I could be wrong, but I think Qualcomm designs its own chips and only licenses the “API”, so it would be no difference for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

From my understanding, most companies take the reference design from Arm and then alter it to fit their needs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

If they use Cortex cores, they are ARM designs. Oryon cores are in house based on Nuvia designs, and I assume it would still require a complete chip redesign if they decide to switch to RISC-V.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ll wait and see. RISC-V is a nice idea, but there are way too many different “standards” to make it a viable ecosystem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What do you mean by standards?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Several differing extensions of the RISC-V core machine instructions, for example. A pain in the rear for any compiler builder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

True, I just wished RISCV laptops were slightly more developed and available. As of now, the specs aren’t there yet in those devices that are available. (8core@2Ghz, but only 16GB Ram, too little for me)

Kind of a bummer, was coming up to a work laptop upgrade soon and was carefully watching the Linux support for Snapdragon X because I can’t bring myself to deal with Apple shenanigans, but like the idea of performance and efficiency. The caution with which I approached it stems from my “I don’t really believe a fucking thing Qualcomm Marketing says” mentality, and it seems holding off and watching was the right call. Oh well, x86 for another cycle, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think, I would go for a ARM Tuxedo PC in your position.

Oh, still some time needed for that as well, but you can see the progress (a lot is working now at kernel 6.11)

https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/Where-are-we-with-our-TUXEDO-ARM-Notebook.tuxedo

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

ARM CPU prob means that at some point you’ll get stuck with a kernel limit.

But did you imply you would buy (now) a RISC-V laptop if it had more RAM & cores?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, in the current macro environment Qualcomm isn’t that tied down & can afford some changes (basically with a few of their biggest partners that can keep their profits up even in a few transitioning years). Not sure what prompted ARM to force such a deal instead of getting like a good compromise.

But also fuck Qualcomm & their closed-softwareness.

Im still hoping I can buy a RISC-V laptop (from Framework?) in 2 or 3 years & just run Linux normally.
And if that can happen & RISC-V still doesn’t overall prosper it’s bcs of some shitty greedy deals between megacorps.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 542K

    Comments