You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
72 points
*

tldr: If you vote for Trump, you hate America.

This part is true

If you vote for anyone who isn’t Trump, you are helping the US take a step in the right direction.

Until we are no longer bound by the Electoral College, this is dangerously false. “Not Trump” isn’t a candidate, and the single candidate with the most votes get the electoral votes. If Trump gets 49% and the “not Trump” votes get 51% but no single “not Trump” candidate gets above 49%, then Trump wins even though Trump got less votes than “not Trump”

The only way to meaningfully vote “not Trump” is to vote for the “not Trump” candidate who everyone is rallying around rather than throwing a stupid protest vote to a third party candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In the 2016 republican primary, Trump got 44.9% of the vote. Three “not Trump” candidates got 50.2% combined, but it was divided between them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points
*

If it is a protest vote, as goes your assumption without evidence? it’s dumb, but it’s their right.

most people vote on policy, so they’re voting for third party candidates that have a stronger stance on whatever policy there is.

in this particular election, Harris already achieved more effective policy change than third candidate platforms in terms of environmentalism, minority rights, and so on, so it makes logical sense to vote for her if you’re a political liberal, but if somebody wants to vote for Stein or anybody else because that candidate is more aligned with their views, that is just as valid as voting for Harris.

they are voting as they should, not as some are hoping they will be scared into voting.

voting sincerely is not “stupid”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It is their right and it’s our right, if not duty, to call them out for exercising their right to the extreme detriment of the very constitution that grants them that right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

“if not duty”

definitely not duty…

“for exercising their right to the extreme detriment…”

…since this isn’t happening.

“…that grants them that right.”

a right you are trying to bully them into not exercising because they won’t do what you say.

interfering with somebody’s right to vote is not as jingoistic as you hope to perform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

voting sincerely is not “stupid”.

If we ever move to some kind of ranked choice or go by the popular vote instead of this gamed Electoral College system? Sure, vote your conscience. Until then, I expect people to rub two brain cells together, see and acknowledge there is a bigger picture, and realize that their moral purity protest vote is counter-productive when everything they want will be impossible if Trump wins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

The system is broken, but that doesn’t mean you have to abandon your principles.

their vote is as valid as any other.

it may be less effective because of the adequated US electoral system, but any vote itself is as valid as any other.

“I expect people to rub two brain cells together”

they’re not dumb, you’re insulting them because they disagree with your perspective.

“see and acknowledge there is a bigger picture”

they probably understand your perspective, there’s no reason why they wouldn’t .

“and realize that their moral purity protest vote”

again, they see things differently, so you are insulting them for no reason.

people talk about third party votes incorrectly as you are here, but most third-party voters vote for the candidate they most believe in, not purely is a protest against the two-party system .

that is a false narrative constructed by the people who have fallen prey to some moral adherence two-party system.

“everything they want will be impossible if Trump wins.”

you are scared of what might happen if Trump wins. third party voters are not willing to compromise their values over their fear.

in this particular election, I don’t think there’s much argument for any of the third party candidates over Harris, but any of those votes are valid and valuable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sincerity doesn’t preclude stupidity. Voting to maintain an aesthetic while knowing it’s causing greater harm is stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

“Sincerity doesn’t preclude stupidity.”

nor does sincerity require it.

bland sort of statement, isn’t it?

“Voting to maintain an aesthetic”

is that how you vote?

try not to project your insecurities onto others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

No. It really is. In 2016, 50,000 Pennsylvanians, including myself, voted for Jill Stein because we didn’t like Hilary. Trump won Pennsylvania by less than 50,000 votes and won the presidency.

It was fucking stupid and we wouldn’t even be discussing this piece of shit today, if we hadn’t revenge voted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

it sucks that Trump won, but your vote was valid and no third party voter was throwing their vote away.

they just lost.

Trump won for many other reasons besides third party voters.

there were a lot of bullshit tactics in 2016 that added up to way more votes lost that had a stronger impact on the election result than third-party voters sticking to their values.

shit, gerrymandering is still legal in the US and your voter registrations have practically no protection from interference. That’s insane.

If you voted according to your values, you voted well.

permalink
report
parent
reply

BestOfLemmy

!bestoflemmy@lemmy.world

Create post

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 111

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments