You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-56 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
56 points

You mean this data? https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

If so, then don’t just look at the positive tests but at the graph that shows tests performed. Positive tests goes up but tests performed is relatively the same. That tells you it is a real increase in positivity. It could be the start of another big peak, or not. Time will tell, but you’d think going through the last years one should pay attention to such statistics. Because if you start taking measures only when you are back to 100.000+ cases a day you are a bit too late.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If so, then don’t just look at the positive tests but at the graph that shows tests performed

and patients committed

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I “admit” committed is funny because that’s what COVID and all of the “I did my own research” hoopla has made me feel like. That I’ve been committed to an insane asylum with all of the loonies spreading their theories justifying their behavior without impunity thereby making COVID more deadly as it lasts longer given such time to continuously mutate…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Right back at you. Please show me where I am not “chill” here? There is one person who is not chill and its certainly not me.

You can still choose to wear a mask or not, theres no law yet or is there? So just don’t, I guess?

The smaller bumps by the way occur because people kept getting vaccines and boosters. How does that look like where you are? When was the last time you got a shot or a booster? From the sound of it a while ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

it’s just that it is still such a small number of cases that it doesn’t matter.

To the best of my knowledge there is no meaningful surveillance in the USA or EU. Some places are still doing wastewater testing but it’s difficult to make solid determinations from wastewater.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Your idiocy is astounding and it’s a miracle your bloodline hasn’t been wiped out yet by natural selection. This article is a warning against complacency and an effort to prevent a second covid crisis. Idiots like you are for a huge part to blame why the first one was so devestating so shut the fuck up and stick to your esotheric yoga group for middle aged women on facebook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I like your disdain for journalists and capitalism and the state but sometimes stories stick around for a long time because they’re actually still on-going. Pandemics usually have multiple cycles. There usually isn’t just one big spread and that’s it. The fact that the state f’ed up the response to the initial wave just makes more waves more likely.

Journos are wrong a lot but not 100% of the time just like 95% lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Its for yor benefit. And NHS actually saves lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

You know you can follow the tweet to learn more about the author, right?

That “random person” is Trisha Greenhalgh - Professor of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford.

Here’s an excerpt from her Oxford Uni profile:
Trish is the author of over 400 peer-reviewed publications and 16 textbooks. She was awarded the OBE for Services to Medicine by Her Majesty the Queen in 2001, made a Fellow of the UK Academy of Medical Sciences in 2014, and elected an International Fellow of the US Academy of Medicine in 2021. She is also a Fellow of the UK Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of General Practitioners, Faculty of Clinical Informatics and Faculty of Public Health.
https://www.phc.ox.ac.uk/team/trish-greenhalgh

Her Google Scholar profile shows that her work has been cited almost 95,000 times in other research papers.
https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?sortby=pubdate&hl=en&user=8KQwEGcAAAAJ&view_op=list_works

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

not knowing the details

“Not knowing the details” is part of scientific endeavour. If we already knew the details there would be no need for science in the first place. We should not hold it against her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 119K

    Comments