You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

This is probably a bit too reductive. Violence is sometimes necessary, but isnā€™t always the best strategy.

In general, the left should take an approach of nonviolent, disruptive agitation, combined with a willingness to use violence in self-defense. Arm up, protect each other, but donā€™t try to instigate a shooting war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Moderates only ever succeed with and because of a radical flank demonstrating the alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

No. The left should use violence as the tool it is that has always gotten results. Every right and freedom has come from the blood of those who fought.

Leave the peaceful donothings to the lib/centrists, because they wonā€™t do shit anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It smells like Fed in here. ą² _ą² 

Anarchists have a significant history of using ā€œPropaganda of the Deedā€ and accomplishing fuck all with it. No shortage of examples among the history of the broader left, too. So yeah, Iā€™m gonna have to call BS on this.

Violence is a tool, and thereā€™s a time and place for it. Donā€™t be an idiot adventurist about it though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If youā€™re going to use violence, be very smart about your targets who, where, how. You want those in power to fear, not the average gun toting American who is just trying to pay rent and buy food. If you make that population fear for their lives they wonā€™t hesitate to kill you and in most of this country they could do so legally.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the siteā€™s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. Itā€™s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). Itā€™s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to ā€œMom! Heā€™s bugging me!ā€ and ā€œIā€™m not touching you!ā€ Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Thatā€™s all the rules!

Civic Links

ā€¢ Register To Vote

ā€¢ Citizenship Resource Center

ā€¢ Congressional Awards Program

ā€¢ Federal Government Agencies

ā€¢ Library of Congress Legislative Resources

ā€¢ The White House

ā€¢ U.S. House of Representatives

ā€¢ U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

ā€¢ News

ā€¢ World News

ā€¢ Business News

ā€¢ Political Discussion

ā€¢ Ask Politics

ā€¢ Military News

ā€¢ Global Politics

ā€¢ Moderate Politics

ā€¢ Progressive Politics

ā€¢ UK Politics

ā€¢ Canadian Politics

ā€¢ Australian Politics

ā€¢ New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments