It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-19 points

Wait ‘til they unveil the shady business deals between Pfizer and the good folks who told us “safe and effective.”

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Enjoy the ventilator

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

the good folks who told us “safe and effective.”

…weren’t wrong, and we’ve got a global vaccinated population to prove it, so I’m not sure what your point is.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments