You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
54 points
-16 points

Direct worker control ensures a formally flat management structure instead of a hierarchical one. This structure is influenced by activist collectives and civic organizations, with all members allowed and expected to play a managerial role.

Hey that sounds like a horrible process but good luck, it’d be great if that could work somehow.

Seriously, have you ever tried to get 30 or more people to work on a complicated project? Flat structures like that make it take 300x as long.

It’s great for, maybe metalsmiths? Or . . y’know, sanitation workers? Where the gear and scope is more or less always the same? But for software engineering it can’t work like that. Not at any real scale, anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Worker cooperatives don’t have to have a flat structure. Smaller cooperatives might use a flat structure, but larger companies will delegate business decisions to management. The main difference is that the board of directors represent the workers instead of outside shareholders making it democratic

@politicalmemes

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The main difference is that the board of directors represent the workers instead of outside shareholders making it democratic

So from the parent comment if “liberals would want a woman CEO, while leftists wouldn’t have a CEO” (paraphrasing) does that mean worker collectives don’t have a CEO or that the CEO is ‘good’ because the board represents the workers (and therefore isn’t leftist)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

It’s always funny when people say this can’t work, when it constantly works better than any current hierarchical structure. All the collectives I’m in work great, and there are tons of worker owned co-ops going strong, one of my activist groups will often go for meals at one after a day of protesting.

Just because you can’t imagine something different doesn’t mean it can’t work. It’s not just a mess of everyone trying to dominate each other, it’s cooperative and there are simple processes to facilitate it. It’s possible to run countries this way.

Hierarchies exist to exploit and abuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All the collectives I’m in work great,

Good to know. What do they do? What field are they in, I mean. How many people are in them?

The listing of worker collectives in one of the other comment showed mostly supermarkets and service industries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There are many corporations structured this way or in a form closer to it the one with a board of directors and a ceo.

Anyone who can’t see how it’s possible is the same mind as those who couldn’t imagine a country without king and lords.

CEO is the king and the board are the lords. For whatever reason leaders loves to implement this hierarchy and the plebs except it. Probably because the later enabled the former.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

There are many corporations structured this way or in a form closer to it the one with a board of directors and a ceo.

I assume you mean “in a form closer to it than the one . . . “

What corporations? When you say many do you mean like 10 or like 20,000?

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Hilarious that you would bring up software engineering considering one of the largest names in PC gaming, Valve, has a flat management structure. Seems like they’re able to manage running the Steam store, game development, and hardware development just fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think I just read that Gabe has a fleet of yachts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

You think there are no large worker co-ops in the US? Embarrassing. You’ve never heard of Bob’s Red Mill or Publix?

And because I’m sure you aren’t happy with two examples, here’s an incomplete list of notable worker co-ops in the US from Wikipedia:

It’s fucking big

But yeah, dawg, worker co-ops are fake news.

PS: is there some reason you omitted the two sentences before that which make it clear this is one method of organizing worker’s co-ops?

If exercised directly, all members meet regularly to make—and vote on—decisions on how the co-operative is run. Direct workers’ cooperatives sometimes use consensus decision-making to make decisions

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

One thing I think is telling is how corporate law firms, accounting firms, consulting firms, financial firms etc. will happily provide their services advising shareholder corporations on how to operate, but are themselves organized as partnerships.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 137K

    Comments