600

Imperial rule(lemmy.blahaj.zone)

posted
by
Avatar
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
in
Avatar
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
192 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
humanspiral@lemmy.ca
4 points

if one major power loses influence, another will benefit from the vacuum.

Multipolarism is not a vacuum. Hypocritical “Rules based world order” delusion backed by sycophantic colonies to tyranical CIA is a propaganda tool that deludes an empire into over reaching and collapse and “the vacuum”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
17 points

I think you may have misunderstood me. I’m not saying that imperialism is justified because of the possibility of a vacuum, I’m saying that the possibility of a vacuum is an acceptable risk for the sake of opposing imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

196

!196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

other rules

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 185K

    Comments

Community moderators