Yes there is. Way more than your imagined threat to “russian” speakers in ukraine.
Yes there is.
Reasserting your empty claim is not evidence.
Way more than your imagined threat to “russian” speakers in ukraine.
You have got to be fucking kidding me.
- BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict
- Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians
- Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences.
- The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
- The Guardian, 2017: ‘I want to bring up a warrior’: Ukraine’s far-right children’s camp – video
- WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know
- Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
- The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
- openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences
- Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?
- NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide
“You have got to be fucking kidding me.” Send in the Wagner PMC group (named after Hitler’s favourite composer and co founded by a NAZI) to oppose them Because of course Russia does not have a NAZI problem. (Shame Prigozhin got out of line and had to be murdered in the end.)
“Reasserting your empty claim is not evidence.” If you spent 20 seconds more looking you would have found more news reports of the North Korean troops. But you didn’t. And I’m not bothering.
If you spent 20 seconds more looking you would have found more news reports of the North Korean troops.
I’ve seen the reports. They say those troops are in Russia. If they’ve done anything to date, they’ve defended Russian territory, in Russia.
Show it then? It would be much more effective than “yes there is.”
