You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
208 points

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

permalink
report
reply
103 points

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about “Americans” they aren’t talking about us schlubs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The corporations are people too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don’t use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don’t take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor’s appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that’s not a problem either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I fear this is exactly who they’re courting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It harms wealthy asshole Americans at Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s really sad…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It would leave the newly-split-off chrome in the same financial situation as firefox. Arguably a worse one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

…a radical interventionist agenda…

That language seems very “Trump-esque”, and I doubt it is a coincidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it’s own is not a business.

Say you buy chrome, you have to options

  1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you’re in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

  2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

Neither of these options are better than the status quo

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 642K

    Comments