Comment by copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone on That lawsuit against Steam’s 30% cut of game sales is now a class action, meaning many other developers could benefit

That requirement only exists when you also offer a Steam key for the game that’s being sold. So Valve is actually the good guy here: You can sell on another store, where Steam doesn’t get any money, and give the user a Steam key, provided by Steam for free, and the only thing they ask is to match the price on Steam.

Don’t offer a Steam key, and you can pick any price.

That is my understanding of the issue.

There is a claim by some developers that Valve was pressuring them behind the scenes (“don’t offer your game for cheaper elsewhere or else we’ll take it down from our store”) a while ago, but I’ve never seen appropriate proof of it, and that was part of (an earlier?) lawsuit.

We should regularly be seeing lower All-Time-Lows for most multi-platform games on non-Steam platforms then, right?

I don’t think we do. Why not?

Because that’s not beneficial for companies. They want to make (more) money.

The only option most developers and publishers would have is to move to another store, where the cut is usually the same, with the exception of Epic Games Store. And as pointed out elsewhere, setting up and managing your own store ends up being more expensive than a 30% cut. And then you still don’t have the same features as Steam.

Because that’s not beneficial for companies. They want to make (more) money.

If having a lower price means you make more sales, then yes, it definitely can be beneficial for companies.

If you want to make $40 per copy, you could sell for $60 on Steam, or about $47.00 on Epic.

Being on sale for $47 would “unlock” more customers than you’d get if your game was only available for $60 everywhere. Some customers won’t ever buy the game at $60, but they would at $47, and the company makes the same amount of money.

That is beneficial for companies.

Why are you making it my responsibility to explain why companies are not passing on their savings to consumers?

As a bystander I appreciate you. I learned some things I didn’t know.

But you can sell for 47 on epic. You just cannot sell for 47 on epic giving a key that redeems on steam.

Exactly; this whole price restriction on Steam is for games that will be hosted and downloaded from Steam.

It makes no sense for Steam to allow developers to sell Steam keys for cheaper via other stores when Steam has to then shoulder all the bandwidth and Remote Play/etc.

As long as you never want your $60 game featured on Steam, you can absolutely do that.

Which do you think is worth more?

As long as you never want your $60 game featured on Steam, you can absolutely do that.

Why wouldn’t that happen?

Or they could sell on Epic for $60 and just pocket more per sale because most players are used to new games being $60 anyway.

Besides, Steam itself also unlocks more customers even at same or higher prices because it can be a pain to get EGS games working on Linux sometimes, whereas Steam’s seamless. Maybe we’re a non-existent market force, but personally I’ve been maining Linux for my gaming PC for 4 years and now about 2 years ago I deleted the Windows partition I’d only kept around because I had Forza on the Microsoft store rather than Steam.

Or they could sell on Epic for $60 and just pocket more per sale because most players are used to new games being $60 anyway.

For AAA publishers, definitely. For indie developers or anyone who’d be wanting to try to bring customers to Epic, that wouldn’t be the ideal long-term strategy.

setting up and managing your own store ends up being more expensive than a 30% cut

No, it absolutely does not. But if you’re not on Steam, your indie game doesn’t sell.

As a counter example, Vintage Story seems to be doing okay regardless.

They delibarately decided to not be on Steam.

edit 2: They do run their own store, but it’s a bit janky, has less payment options if I recall, and no regional pricing.

edit: Besides, one of the reasons indies like to be on Steam is because Steam basically does free advertising for you, with Discovery Queue and just generally pushing games that do well to more people (beneficial for Steam also, of course). But that’s a service that’s paid for by that 30% cut (among other things).

Why should we see that?

How much income per sale a seller is willing to accept is a big part of the equation that goes into pricing

And? If they sell at the same price as Steam but with the store taking a smaller cut they’ll make more money per sale.

A lower price may attract more buyers, leading to more money overall (rather than only seeking to maximize each individual sale)

And which platform has the most potential buyers, by a long shot? Steam. That’s why you’re usually seeing all time lows on the Steam platform, because the sheer amount of buyers outweighs the per sale loss.

They absolutely pressure developers to not sell cheaper elsewhere, even without a Steam key.

http://blog.wolfire.com/2021/05/Regarding-the-Valve-class-action

Steam might be the best of the gatekeepers, but they’re still anticompetitive.

I’ve looked into Wolfire’s claims multiple times in the past, but it was never confirmed elsewhere, so I don’t know what to think. Maybe this was a thing Valve did in the past (in which case, yes, boo!), but they couldn’t get away with it anymore, with the volume of developers that are now on their platform.

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

That lawsuit against Steam’s 30% cut of game sales is now a class action, meaning many other developers could benefit(www.rockpapershotgun.com)

PC Gaming

!pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Community stats

Community moderators