332alright rule(lemmy.cafe)posted 2 months ago byspujb@lemmy.cafein 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneView comments74 commentssavehidereportSort:HotTopControversialNewOldYou are viewing a single thread.View all comments View context [ +- ]Homescool@lemmy.world-1 points2 months agoI don’t think anybody was exploited who didn’t already deserve it here. permalinksavereportparentreply[ +- ]spujb@lemmy.cafeOP4 points2 months agoyou’re free to believe that, without proof there’s no argument either way, and in any case it’s my personal belief this kind of manipulation of assets should be illegal no matter the target audience permalinksavereportparentreply