You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
11 points

This is basically the tolerance paradox but for violence. If people are willing to use violence on me (denying healthcare, keeping us poor, stochastic terrorism) then I’m fine using it back, otherwise they get free reign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

But the violence will never end. By using violence back on them you change nothing. The solution is not violence, it is political action.

If you have any actual impact on politics via violence then you’re justing going to tear down a bad system for an obviously worse outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Political action is violent by definition. To rule somebody essentially means nothing else than to enforce your will upon somebody by force.

There can be no talk of consensual politics in a society where opinions are shaped by media owned and managed by the ruling tiny, very wealthy minority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Lmao taxing big businesses for operating in an economic region and using those funds to create railroads, libraries, hospitals iS ViOleNCe!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The violence already doesn’t end. Why should I sit and take it? Obviously we need political stuff too, but violence is a useful tool to those ends.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The “violence” of only the majority of people getting the healthcare they need is nothing compared to the “violence” of riots and murders in the streets.

Nor would more violence in any way remedy the old violence.

permalink
report
parent
reply