You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-8 points
*

Store exclusivity is paid, this means that the devs get a guaranteed income instead of relying on the Steam gamble.

Would you work for your employer if you might be paid more than average but no guarantee on that and only in two years if it happens at all as it depends on the number of clients you got and how influencers feel about your work once it’s complete?

I don’t know about you but I look around and I don’t know anyone who would accept those conditions. That’s where exclusivity becomes an option, you might not have as high an income, but that employer tells you ahead of hiring you how much you’ll make in the next year with a commission on every sale you make once your work is complete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m fully aware, and I don’t even blame developers, especially indies, as I can completely understand their reasoning and commercial consideration. But from a user perspective I just see a store trying to buy market share and either forcing customers to wait a year or cave and use that store. Epic doesn’t fork over money to help developers, it does so to grab a piece of the pie and create value for shareholders.

Personally I prefer not buying or using platforms from companies whose policies I don’t agree with. I avoid Amazon for that reason, and Epic’s store is therefore also on my personal blacklist.

It’s a choice I’m allowed and willing to make. Of course you are free to disagree and by all means, do whatever you feel is right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Do you purchase on Steam? Because it is in a monopolistic position and that’s much more anti consumer than anything Epic or GOG can do in their position.

That’s not even talking about the 30% cut which means less money going to the devs (and before you say they use the money to innovate, devs being able to afford making games is much more important for gaming than developing virtual trading cards or enriching a billionaire with a yacht collection).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because it is in a monopolistic position

Is it forcing a monopolistic position? Or is it’s “monopolistic position” just a result of it being popular and widely used?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t know about you but I look around and I don’t know anyone who would accept those conditions.

except publishers frequently do accept those conditions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

I’m talking about employees, not businesses, people like you and me

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

and I’m saying your analogy doesn’t work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The employees got paid while working on the game. They don’t only get paid based on sales.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Gaming

!gaming@lemmy.world

Create post

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 511

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments