18

Mass resignations at Intelligence as Elsevier actually bothers slightly for once

posted
by
Avatar
David Gerard@awful.systemsM
in
Avatar
sneerclub@awful.systems
14 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
Don Piano@feddit.org
10 points

Never heard of any colleague who had issues publishing stuff relating to intelligence, which makes me suspect that the “free of prejudices against this kind of research” bit is maybe a lie. I mean this in the sense that it might be not prejudice but rather just plain old judice, i.e. peer review that prevents edgelords from publishing.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
Soyweiser@awful.systems
12 points

Which views exactly?

Ow you know the ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Don Piano@feddit.org
5 points

The ones motivated by [Peter Sellers] bold curiosity for the adventure ahead! [/Sellers]?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Don Piano@feddit.org
9 points

“In recent years, the journal has come under increasing attack for publishing research that some people consider racist” lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Don Piano@feddit.org
5 points

Ugh, still waking up so multiple comments.

Even the shittier variants of intelligence related research I know of has no big issues finding a journal. How bad must Intelligence be?

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 379

    Monthly active users

  • 201

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments

Community moderators