You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
27 points

Who cares…it’s just changing one shitpile for the next soon-to-be shitpile. Bluesky will inevitably go down the shitter too once its users have enough inertia to keep them there as they squeeze them dry.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

Twitter isn’t falling due to not being open source, or not being decentralized, or any of the other reasons I’ve heard people advocate for mastodon.

People are leaving twitter because it has gone fully right wing in politics. Twitter will not “fail” in the traditional sense. Twitter will fall, but not fail.

Twitter will be the right wing conspiracy platform.

Bluesky will be what twitter was 5 years ago for the left wing.

Nothing else has changed. This isn’t a rebellion against corporate social media. This isn’t meant to be a fediverse uprising. None of that is happening. This is nothing more than Mary, and Beth who voted for Harris wanting to use twitter how they used to, without right wing agenda being added to their twitter feed. Which is exactly what bluesky is. A twitter clone without the racists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Dare I suggest that the reason for twitter becoming so right wing, is that it’s a centralized social media website, subject to the crazed far right whims of the capitalist who bought it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Twitter went right wing because of the model.

When it’s all about following people and very short forms of communication, it will eventually lean right.

Same way the lemmy format encourages nuance and ideas over people, so it will eventually lean left

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

…I wasn’t replying to you. I was replying to the other guy who said it doesn’t matter since bluesky is just the same as twitter in terms of ownership.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Bluesky is at least semi-decentralized, however, though not to the same extent as something like Mastodon

I’d also argue that Twitter is also uniquely bad even among other problematic platforms

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Bluesky is at least semi-decentralized

No it isn’t, this is marketing and until the developers actually put their money where their mouth is and provide the genuine capacity for decentralization (not just along some narrow technical definition but actually decentralized in practice) this is pure marketing hype that you absolutely shouldn’t trust until you are given indisputable proof and then you should still be skeptical because they can always pull the rug out from under you.

Bluesky is open source yes, but what they are talking about is the CLIENT side of Bluesky, the actual system is dependent upon proprietary code that is most definitely not open source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s actually more so the other way around. The backend (PDS and relays) is open source but I believe the AppView is not currently open source

https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds

https://github.com/bluesky-social/indigo

https://github.com/bluesky-social/jetstream

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yep, and for anyone who curious why it’s not actually decentralized, I highly suggest to read this thread from someone who worked on ActivityPub:

https://social.coop/@cwebber/113527462572885698

And part 2:

https://social.coop/@cwebber/113647109852249805

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If nothing else I will personally find it very funny if Elon Musk spent $44,000,000,000 on something and then unintentionally destroyed it in just three years

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

He didn’t spend 44 billion on twitter. He spent 44 billion to gain a hand in the 2024 election. He already won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m still going to enjoy it if I get to watch the $44b not buy any more elections. I know he can afford to do it again, but you’ve got to take what joy you can get from the world, you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe it didn’t started for that goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The Saudis footed the bill for most of that $44bn - most is only out of pocket about $10bn of it iirc.

Fwiw he didn’t actually intend to buy it, he was shitposting and got nailed by the SEC, only THEN did he try to work out what to do with it.

Unfortunately the “what” turned out to be destroying democracy and helping Trump turn the US into a feudal state

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Saudis footed the bill for most of that $44bn - most is only out of pocket about $10bn of it iirc.

I mean they definitely got their money’s worth in terms of torpedoing one of the most threatening social media tools for politically destabilizing authoritarian regimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Anyone who wants to see everything Musk owns crash and burn?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 572K

    Comments