I’m trying to pick a DSLR-compatible Canon telephoto lens for wildlife photography in low-light conditions (also, I like doing urban candid photography/street photography from distances, so that too). Naturally, this means high ISO and low f-stop. For some reason, all I can find are like f-4; is that normal? Also, what’s with all the “telephoto” lenses that max out at 200mm? Shouldn’t something like 400mm be better? I suppose I don’t want something too bulky, so 400mm is probably pushing it but idk… if you have experience in this, let me know what you think. I can only seem to find a handful of options, and most are for mirrorless cameras which sucks because I don’t want too many camera bodies so getting ANOTHER one for this purpose would really clutter my shelves as I don’t have any mirrorless Canon’s.

Anyways, budget is tight, nothing north of $1000, let me know what you think!

Edit: Posted in wildlife photo community, but it was dead (no posts since like 2 months ago) so figured I’d move it here.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points
*

The words “low light”, “400mm”, “wildlife” (implying excellent autofocus), “DSLR” (old), and especially “cheap” don’t belong together.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

thank you haha. duly noted.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Photography

!photography@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don’t spam.

Community stats

  • 652

    Monthly active users

  • 443

    Posts

  • 1.2K

    Comments

Community moderators