You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
100 points

If the EU has its way we might all get this.

One can hope.

People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

The battery could power the device wirelessly at this point.

They could even claim they’re saving the environment by not including the battery after a couple release cycles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

So my consumer preference for a sealed phone with a specific form factor simply doesn’t matter I guess?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Do you mean your consumer preference as it is currently dictated by companies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Not I mean my preferences which are dictated by my individual agency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

Even if it was a legitimate problem, it’s sad that only about half of the phones are certified waterproof even if almost all are sealed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not that the phones are warrantied against water damage even if they are rated as water resistant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol no doubt. Remember when Apple (and other manufacturers I guess) stopped including chargers in the box and they told us it was to reduce waste and was better for the environment? I wonder how many millions of dollars it saved them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The battery could power the device wirelessly at this point.

That’s not a thing. Wireless charging is horribly inefficient and produces lots of heat, reducing performance and battery life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure, but it is possible.

Might happen if it has some sort of benefit that we don’t know about for waterproofing separate batteries, even if it is indeed less efficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Oof i didn’t think of them selling the battery separate possibly with an upcharge. monkeys paw curls

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You probably also didn’t think about them no longer making the battery two years after releasing the phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Easy enough to do the same thing they do for cars and force them to make parts for 10 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Third party has always been the solution to this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I had that issue with an Otterbox case. Bought it, it was bulky but protected the phone well. After 3 years the rubber tore near the charging port. They offer “lifetime” warranty (5 years). Well, wrote them for a replacement and they simply said nah, they don’t have that case any more for a phone this “old”. So they didn’t honor the warranty and just told me I’m out of luck.

What the hell do I buy an expensive phone case for when they can’t even honor a 5 year warranty? That was the last Otterbox for me, Spigen was the choice I went with afterwards. Can’t go wrong with a 10 buck phone case, I don’t care if it breaks in a few years.

When it comes to phones every manufacturer just gives you the finger if it’s 3+ years old it seems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oooh devious! “We listened to our customers so now all new iPhones will have replaceable batteries.*”

  • Battery not included. Purchase a compatible battery from the Apple store for just $99.99.
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think the proposal went through. The Deadline is 2027 though. But hopefully, manufacturers will change in preparation of this rule so we maybe see the effects earlier like we saw with usb c? Officially, obligatory usb c usage starts in at the end of 2024, but I think everyone but Apple has already switched and Apple said they’re planning to comply within the time frame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

About waterproofing: I’ve had to replace a G6’s glass back twice and both times the new cover had the seal pre-installed and the phone could still be cleaned with soap and water, no issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply

> Greentext

!greentext@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 444

    Posts

  • 9.4K

    Comments

Community moderators