You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
17 points

I’m too stupid to understand what that article is talking about. Can someone translate to layman’s terms?

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I could be wrong but as I understand it. You know magnetism based on positive and negative poles, now they can read and write SPIN, which is another property of electrons (that are in everything, even things nonmagnetic). If it’s true, and scales, we could use non-ferrous better materials to achieve what we do currently with ferrous materials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sooo we can magnetize nonmagnetic materials?

Tractor beam when?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sadly still magnetic force that loses strength exponentially based on distance

permalink
report
parent
reply
-55 points

chatgpt can eli5 summarize. who knows if its accurate enough

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

What value is a summary when you fully acknowledge that you can not trust it for accuracy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

i agree, but what can you trust for accuracy in these times?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

ChatGPT cam bullshit about anything, but odds are anything complex will be wrong.

Even simple things are probably wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would not even trust it to summarize nuanced details in a lengthy article, let alone something science related (especially about new discoveries).

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<— rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments