You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

One of the very few phones like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

> Greentext

!greentext@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 444

    Posts

  • 9.4K

    Comments

Community moderators