You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-7 points
*

That guy clearly never heard about the Pareto Principle.

E: fuck yeah, successfully triggered all the hexbear tankies. As fun as poking a wasp nest with a long stick. If only there was an online tankie bug spray equivalent…

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

The one that stated that 80% of the land in italy was owned by 20% of the people? I think they did hear about it and did apply it to Cuba but I might be wrong there.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Why would it matter if he heard about a debunked theory only loved by reactionaries?

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

If 20% of people own 80% of the land or wealth or whatever in a capitalist country then all that shows is that capitalism produces Pareto distributions. That does not mean Pareto distributions are some universal law of nature nor does it mean that non-capitalist systems are impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

The pareto principle was produced by guessing based on anecdotal observations it was never a serious thing

permalink
report
parent
reply

You should e-mail that to the presidents of Cuba, Venezuela, and China, to show them the error of their communist ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Somebody hasn’t heard of the Parenti principle…

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

The Pareto principle is an economics idea - something is considered Pareto efficient if you can make someone better off without making someone else worse off, and you are at a Pareto optimum when you can’t make anyone better off without making someone worse off. Of course, because “better off” and “worse off” are entirely up for interpretation, people argue that taxing the rich to improve the lives of the poor is not Pareto efficient because you’re worse off if you have less money regardless of how much money you have left. So the only Pareto efficient solution is to grow the economy until all the poor people make enough money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

So the only Pareto efficient solution is to grow the economy until all the poor people make enough money.

Boy is that some head stuck up their own ass economist shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

That’s really dumb. the end result is literally identical, because money would have to be worth less afterwards for the math to work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Evolution creates a lot of crabs, and you can find the golden ratio expressed in nature all over. What does that have to do with the price of tea?

permalink
report
parent
reply

The Pareto Principle is a bullshit theory where a crank saw a handful of statistics were similar and thus decided it was a natural law. The only reason it’s still considered seriously is because economics is to mathematics what astrology is to physics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

What does the productive capabilities of peas have to do with how we should structure society?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 265K

    Comments