And apparently, also when you think that ‘They’ is a perfectly serviceable gender-neutral singular pronoun, but are willing to use other pronouns if asked to.
EDIT: Other removable offenses on Blahaj now include questioning mod/admin decisions and quoting the modlog as a reason why you’re leaving.
edit: i think i misunderstood pug’s comment so putting my response behind a spoiler till i get confirmation sorry for any confusion
click to open
No, not even close to what was said
So, if I show you evidence that that was said, you would consider amending your understanding?
promise?
promise ?
“Trolls, spammers, twitter users, it doesn’t matter who they are, your options are to respect their pronouns, or to not engage with them. […] This isn’t a free reign for trolls and spammers. The rules still apply.“ ada in the body text of the c/main post
its pretty close to what i said. reporting and/or blocking are indeed prominent tools in “not engaging with them,” i will apologize for using non-specific language there. i’ll edit my comment.
my statement ammended: she said “do not engage if you can’t not do validity discourse or misgender” which is such a tiny ask, and yet for some reason that’s a end-all situation for you
So, if I show you evidence that that was said, you would consider amending your understanding?
Not even close to what was said in my argument, as the next sentence very clearly indicates
There’s nothing even vaguely resembling that in the comment you’re supposedly responding to.
An utterly moronic attempt.
No, not even close to what was said
Oh can you clear up the grammar here? I think we’re talking past each other—let me course correct. Did you mean “what I said” or “what Ada said?” (or another acting party maybe?) I admit if I got the wrong meaning from that sentence my response doesn’t make sense, and in that case my apologies!
