This is a twofer:

  1. The article itself
  2. HN’s take on it
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

One thing that may not be visible from outside the profession is that there are a lot of steps in between air-hockey tables and the research frontier, especially for the part of the frontier that gets the most press — black holes, Large Hadron Collider stuff, quantum computing, etc. Wanting to understand any of those things at a level better than (bong rip) man, like, quantum mechanics, dude, requires systematic study. Doing that entirely on one’s own might not be impossible, but it’s damn hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Great no problem I’ll just read through the sequences and be all caught up!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

remember to carry the thumb drive with your personal frame of a blade of grass falling - you should all have been issued one in your welcome packs by cult greeter upon arrival

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I keep it with me always, but never in plain sight in case a computer sees it through a webcam and starts getting ideas

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

eyelid twitches

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 573

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators