This is a twofer:

  1. The article itself
  2. HN’s take on it
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

It is a field that attracts a lot of cranks (who are pretty recognizable as being cranks via various patterns). Being a well known physicist must be hell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You don’t even have to be well-known to get crank attention. Post anything with “quantum” in the title on the arXiv and they’ll find your e-mail.

Source: this is one of the few times when I can say “trust me, bro” and be entirely sincere about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Had no idea it was worse. Damn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Back when I was an undergrad I saw a letter addressed to the department from a German gentleman who claimed to have invented a perpetual motion machine (this was the department of mechanics). I remember the letter being quite typographically florid and especially the author’s likeness in silhouette.

My advisor had fun finding the flaw in the proposal. Took a few minutes.

I often wondered if demolishing a PM suggestion would be a good extra credit question on an exam.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 549

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments

Community moderators