You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

How’s it going? The Wall Street Journal looked at five “agents” that are totally in real production use, guys. Three of the “agents” generate plans under close human supervision. Two of the “agents” are chatbots — showing how the real future of agents is simply to rebrand existing systems as “agents.” Or they’ll be “AGI” — A Guy Instead. [WSJ]

Seriously. Everyone putting money on this is a total schmuck.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I’m afraid they’re putting so much money into it, that it becomes too big to fail. The behemoths will push onwards, but the smallest investors will lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The end-game for AI (and Crypto, increasingly) is to incorporate into federal systems and financial systems in such a way that they can’t be removed without gutting departments or upsetting major donors.

These are entirely parasitic organizations. They only exist to deplete the assets of the organizations they latch onto.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 549

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments

Community moderators