Jury nullification is the term for when a jury declines to convict a defendant despite overwhelming evidence of guilt. This can be a form of civil disobedience, a political statement against a specific law, or a show of empathy and support to the defendant.

“It’s not a legal defense sanctioned under the law,” said Cheryl Bader, associate professor of law at Fordham School of Law. “It’s a reaction by the jury to a legal result that they feel would be so unjust or morally wrong that they refuse to impose it, despite what the law says.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
49 points

Never thought I’d see a mainstream outlet discussing this. There’s less plausible deniability for potential jurors now

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I am confident some evidence will be debatable. It’s quite possible that jurors can honestly say they aren’t convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. The arrest alone is bizarre, and the trial will bring all sorts of things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

They can’t dismiss all the jury candidates…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Welcome to the United States of America, where the justice system is a cruel and unusual joke and only for the working class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Soon it’ll just be twelve AI models

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments