Jury nullification is the term for when a jury declines to convict a defendant despite overwhelming evidence of guilt. This can be a form of civil disobedience, a political statement against a specific law, or a show of empathy and support to the defendant.

“It’s not a legal defense sanctioned under the law,” said Cheryl Bader, associate professor of law at Fordham School of Law. “It’s a reaction by the jury to a legal result that they feel would be so unjust or morally wrong that they refuse to impose it, despite what the law says.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

If all vote not guilty it’s called an acquittal.

Source: I have been a public defender in NYC for 15 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Right… And they would vote not guilty even though the guilt is obvious. Despite the evidence…

I have been penguine emperor of Iran for 38 year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s literally the definition of jury nullification which is what this discussion is about.

Congrats on your reign btw. Sounds like a “Happy Feat”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Am glad that you realized the defenition finally. Good on you!

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments