Spread this OC far and wide.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-8 points

Can’t raise taxes for the rich exclusively in the US. The 16th amendments wording prohibits raising taxes for specific individuals or groups of people. It has to be that everyone pays more taxes or it violates the Constitution. So if any politician says they’re going to make the rich pay their fair share, keep in mind that you’re going to pay more too.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Progressive taxes already exist and are perfectly legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I wasn’t talking about a flat tax. I was stating that if taxes increased for one part of society then it has to increase for everyone. Otherwise, whichever party is in power would increase taxes on the other party’s registered voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s just not how taxes work. It’s also not how they should work.

I have never, and I daresay will never have to pay a tax on owning and operating a personal private jet.

I have never paid the rather hefty taxes on cigarettes.

There are plenty of taxes that target behaviors that have nothing to do with voting. These taxes are necessary because these behaviors cause indirect but real harm to others, and a tax is much more civil throwing rocks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Taxes could be raised on things which disproportionately affect billionaires, it’s not like a flat tax increase is the only option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s hard to find even one thing that affects just one group of people. For example, increasing the Capital Gains tax will also impact retirees cashing in their retirement plans. Also, what’s to stop them from just leaving the country and renouncing US citizenship when taxes get too burdensome?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Probably the same reason they are manipulating the US right now. Greed.

But lets stop pretending you aren’t carrying a billionaire’s water for them in this argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
  1. The emphasis of the post is not taxation.

  2. A progressive income tax, as well as augmentation of the capital gains tax, are various ways to tax the rich that are obviously constitutional.

  3. While some right-wing sources insist a wealth tax is unconstitutional, in fact no judicial inquiry has yet been tried, and mainstream sources readily affirm its viability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not saying that the progressive income tax is illegal. I’m stating an increase on one bracket will also mean an increase on all brackets. And such things as raising property taxes or the capital gains tax will hurt others than those you want to pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Please justify your claim that increasing the marginal tax rate for one bracket requires doing so for all.

Also note, even taking your claim on its merits, those in lower brackets benefit more greatly from spending on social programs. A household may experience a small rise in taxes offset by a large gain from in social spending.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Antiwork

!antiwork@lemmy.ml

Create post
  1. We’re trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We’re trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

Community stats

  • 411

    Monthly active users

  • 363

    Posts

  • 3.9K

    Comments