This is a twofer:

  1. The article itself
  2. HN’s take on it
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

sheesh i guess life sciences are too much of a dirty job [1] for billionaire megaminds. unless they want to pull a theranos, of course

[1] unlike with physics to some degree, or maths generally or CS specifically you won’t get too far on blackboard only without lab work. like selected subfields of physics, biotech has that aura of place where all these old scifi tropes that sv wankers misunderstand and fawn over come to life, and also there’s some crossover with startup/vc crowd

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 573

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators