37

Anthropic chief says AI could surpass “almost all humans at almost everything” shortly after 2027(arstechnica.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
in
Avatar
techtakes@awful.systems
26 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
istewart@awful.systems
14 points

Really starting to get a bit sick of Ars Technica. They’re OK for general interest tech stuff, but their editorial line (and some of their commenter base) have been really credulous about AI vendors’ PR.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
nightsky@awful.systems
3 points

Same. They’ve been a staple in my RSS feed list for so long (and they are one of the few sites where the RSS feed isn’t just the headlines). But recently I’ve been thinking several times already about throwing them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
4 points

With Ars, the best option is to stick to general tech, science, public policy and tech culture. I say this as someone who has read them for ~20 years and has been subscribing for ~10+ years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
istewart@awful.systems
4 points

I’ve seen people criticize Eric Berger for being up Musk’s ass about SpaceX, though I’m simply not that passionate about space stuff anymore. And so far I don’t see them posting anything about the NIH freezeout, even though that surely affects a vast swath of their reader base. Seems odd.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 573

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators