!iso8601@lemmy.sdf.org gang, rise up

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

Meh. It’s getting a lot of hate here, but I think it works well in casual short term planning. Context (July) - > precision (15).

If I want to communicate the day in the current month, I just say the day, no month.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

ok but by that logic you’d start with the year

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No because the year is a super large time; there’s a reason people always say they take a bit to adjust to writing the new year in dates because it’s s long enough period of time that it almost becomes automatic.

For archiving, sure; most other things, no (logically, ISO-8601 is probably the best for most cases, in general, but I’ll die on the hill that MM-DD-YYYY is better than DD-MM-YYYY).

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

well either you omit the year, or you start with it

americans start with the month and end with the year, which is totally wild

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. It would be like reading the minute of the clock before the hour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the year is a super large time

Not when you’re old… I’ll be 50 this year, they’re flying by.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

*15th

permalink
report
parent
reply