You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

A recent article suggests Trump actually lost when you include rejected ballots. https://www.gregpalast.com/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Liberal Qanon

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t really know what this is supposed to mean, but I assume it’s some kind of silly quip.

Regardless, I’m not arguing for the article - just thought it was interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

That’s ok, normal people will be able to tell what I mean

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“In other words, vote suppression cost Kamala Harris no less than 3,565,000 votes. Harris would have topped Trump’s official total by 1.2 million. Most important, this 2.3% suppression factor undoubtedly cost Harris the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. If not for the wholesale attack on votes and voters, Harris would have won the election with 286 Electoral votes.”

You could consider re-posting the information as a new thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply