You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
35 points

Mythbusters embodied the scientific method, but I do wish they’d stopped to actually properly explain it at some point. “Writing it down” is definitely part of the process, but it’s not the whole process. The whole process is what they actually did in most of their episodes:

  1. Make a prediction
  2. Design an experiment to test that prediction
  3. Run the experiment and observe the results
  4. Come up with a conclusion

Sometimes they played fast and loose with some of these steps to make entertaining TV. But, fundamentally, they were doing science.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I mean presumably they wrote it down when they wrote the script

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Screwing around still covers parts 1-3 though. You say something stupid (hypothesis), your friend dares you to do it (experimentation planning), and you do it (experiment).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You say something stupid (hypothesis), your friend dares you to do it

What’s the hypothesis there?

“I’m going to piss on that window.” doesn’t involve a testable hypothesis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I could totally chuck an egg on that roof!

Nuh uh your arm is worse than mine!

Chucks the egg

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 8.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 46K

    Comments