Almost all the links in my front homepage are sponsored now. What’s next, a few ads in the bookmark bar? How about when I enter a URL, I then have to type “McDonald’s” before I can actually navigate there?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

@UltraGiGaGigantic @lemmylurkaround Actually, I would gladly pay for a browser that is just doing its job.
I need one for macOS and iOS, preferrably one solution for both.
Could you point me in the right direction, please?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Maybe you can donate to Mozilla?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How has no one in this thread put together that you can literally just customize your home page, removing categories until it’s literally blank, or only keeping pages you select available.

Git good noobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pay how much and how often?

$20 a month? $50 a month.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m not really sure what you’re getting at?

I understand that my circumstances are unusual but I would absolutely pay $20 a month without a moment’s hesitation.

I would pay $50, but I’d really have to believe in the project.

It’s worth noting that presently mozilla earns $0 from my not using google, and not seeing sponsored tabs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It’s worth noting that presently mozilla earns $0 from my not using google, and not seeing sponsored tabs.

I thought Google pays (or paid?) Mozilla just to be the default engine out the box, regardless of whether you change it or not.

Another point is that it’s so easy to turn those things off (the sponsored shortcuts too) that I wonder if it would be worth the cost of launching an alternate version behind a paywall while making sure it works only for people who pay (which could be seen as DRM anyway, with potentially massive backslash). So I imagine the end result would not be that profitable (whether they decide to paywall it properly or not). Those who wanna donate and have no ads can do that already, those who want a cleaned up version of Firefox can have that and from neutral and independent third parties which I’d argue is better than if it were Mozilla who did it (and you can donate to Mozilla while using those too)… so I’m not sure it would make sense.

But it would make sense to have a donation pool specifically to fund Firefox development. That would be something interesting, considering Mozilla does other things besides Firefox. But I expect they don’t do that because they probably fear all donations will move there and they don’t want to lose funds for other things. We might need to create a separate organization if we want an independent fund for Firefox-based browsers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 972

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments

Community moderators