You may have loved it, but I resent being manipulated into voting in such a way that made me complicit in every centrist’s favorite activity.
highlighting Kamala for the shitty situation that neither candidate had the power to stop.
She had the power to say “If elected, I will stop selling weapons for genocide in accordance with the Leahy Law.” She chose not to exercise that power. Just like you’ve chosen to make excuses for moral cowardice in the face of genocide.
also I think making a baseless claim that someone participating in a fair discussion on this forum loves voting for a genocide breaks Rule 1,
A whole year of being called a trumper for disliking genocide indicates that no, it does not.
Just like you’ve chosen to make excuses for moral cowardice in the face of genocide.
Which candidate did you vote for who was anti-anything-even-tangentially-related-to-another-country-committing-a-genocide? The choice is a false dichotomy, and by falling for it, you’ve enabled the worst fascist in my lifetime to take power.
A whole year of being called a trumper for disliking genocide indicates that no, it does not.
Nah. Trumpers see the genocide as a good thing. Jews are better than Muslims in their hate hierarchy. You might have been called a trumper because you spent a year pushing a false narrative that would ultimately end up getting trump elected though.
