Its actually very much the conversation. The quicker the race to the bottom happens, the quicker this entire bubble bursts, and the quicker we stop torching the planet for imaginary profits.
That’s your opinion/agenda, not a legitimate argument in the conversation about AI efficiency. The discussion is on how best to achieve a goal, and you’re saying that it shouldn’t be achieved. Even if you’re right, you’re still going off on a separate tangent.
You’re the vegan who butts in on the conversation about how best to sear a steak and says meat is murder. You’re welcome to your opinion on meat and you may even be right, but it is of absolutely no value or interest to the people talking about methods for cooking meat.
That’s your opinion/agenda, not a legitimate argument in the conversation about AI efficiency
I’m not arguing about the “efficiency” of it. I’m stating that OpenAI did the exact same thing they are complaining DeepSeek did: Steal other’s work, remix it, and then claimed it as their own.
And to reply to you “tuna fisher” analogy, I would be fully ok with people stealing the loads of tuna, to hasten the collapse of the entire industry.
Its you who is getting into the weeds about this, not I.
