200

Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"(techstartups.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
in
Avatar
techtakes@awful.systems
77 comments
hidereport

Sam “wrong side of FOSS history” Altman must be pissing himself.

Direct Nitter Link:

https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/jiayi_pirate/status/1882839370505621655

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
fallowseed@lemmy.world
33 points

open source behaving like open source? couldn’t be the evil scary chinese!

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
30 points

open weights is not open source. If it were, then nobody would have to work on trying to reproduce it. They could just run the build script.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
David Gerard@awful.systemsM
6 points

unfortunately, nobody cares cos they’re all thieves

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Evinceo@awful.systems
4 points

OSI is gonna mandate that we call it open source now, didn’t ya hear?

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 587

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators