200

Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"(techstartups.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
in
Avatar
techtakes@awful.systems
77 comments
hidereport

Sam “wrong side of FOSS history” Altman must be pissing himself.

Direct Nitter Link:

https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/jiayi_pirate/status/1882839370505621655

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
6 points

yeah, would you look at this https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/deepseek-might-not-be-as-disruptive-as-claimed-firm-reportedly-has-50-000-nvidia-gpus-and-spent-usd1-6-billion-on-buildouts

However, industry analyst firm SemiAnalysis reports that the company behind DeepSeek incurred $1.6 billion in hardware costs and has a fleet of 50,000 Nvidia Hopper GPUs

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
froztbyte@awful.systems
4 points

yep, a completely normal amount of non-specialist hardware that basically everyone has in their back shed. you just don’t turn it on all the time because the neighbours keep complaining about the fan noise. practically anyone could do this!

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 587

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators