See the above edit.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points
*

I agree, this is stupid. Why should we settle for a server where the admin won’t even apply updates on time or fix bugs in a timely manner. Let alone moderate their instance properly.

I barely even use this instance and I’m really only here for !sdfmc@lemmy.sdf.org, I couldn’t imagine how much it would suck if this was my only account or only instance to access Lemmy from.

Edit: Glad to see they’ve been banned. Though it honestly doesn’t really change much in my opinion if something doesn’t seriously change when it comes to the instance management.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

We need sign up barriers at the least. As well as community creation barriers. I’m at the point where I’m willing to be the one to be rude on Mastodon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

One idea I had would be that they could require accounts to have SDF emails, that would basically require people to have Validated TTY accounts, I believe social.sdf.org does this. They could also accomplish the same thing by closing registration completely and having it be solely managed via the Maint command in the TTY shell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes, a validated TTY account is required for social.sdf.org

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is a brilliant idea. It keeps the instance to the people that use the service as well as weeds out trolls. I’m not sure how feasible it is, but if anyone can, I’m sure that people that have kept a system alive since 1987 can.

permalink
report
parent
reply

sdfpubnix

!sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

Fans of SDF

Community stats

  • 358

    Monthly active users

  • 187

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments

Community moderators