You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-3 points

The model is MIT licensed.

Of course you’re free to go full Stallman, but that’s an open source license.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

the build artifact is distributed MIT-licensed, that’s substantially different (and intentionally subversive). there is no reproducibility. which, you know, hint hint nudge nudge that thing that I already said

I realize that outsourced thinking is why you want LLMs, but it clearly still doesn’t help. maybe you should try the old brainmeat. just stop huffing your farts first, those are bad for you

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

Maybe you should try not to act like a complete asshole. You’re pedantic in all the wrong places and extremely arrogant. I know, living in your lonely world makes a bitter person, but you’re still wrong and you’re still an asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

cringe

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

my fucking god how have you missed the point this hard. fuck off

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 621

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments

Community moderators