You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-9 points

So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

Maybe you should try not to act like a complete asshole. You’re pedantic in all the wrong places and extremely arrogant. I know, living in your lonely world makes a bitter person, but you’re still wrong and you’re still an asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

my fucking god how have you missed the point this hard. fuck off

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

also:

So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

fucking no! how in fuck do you manage to misunderstand LLMs so much that you think the weights not being reproducible is at all comparable to… editing Wikipedia from a proprietary browser??? this shit isn’t even remotely exotic from an open source standpoint — it’s a binary blob loaded by an open source framework, like how binary blob modules taint the Linux kernel (you glided right past this reference when our other poster made it, weird that) or how loading a proprietary ROM in an open source emulator doesn’t make the ROM open source. the weights being permissively licensed doesn’t make them open source (or really make any sense at all) if the source literally isn’t available.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

literally begging people to relearn the terms shareware and freeware

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

cringe

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 621

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments

Community moderators