You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

The way I understood the post: You can‘t generate electricity by burning fossil fuel, then capture the CO2 via direct air capture and still have a net gain of energy. (I guess CCS would still allow for a minor net energy gain because it doesn‘t need to fight entropy as much, but then again why bother, if one could use cheap renewables instead)

But yes, direct air capture has already been built, it‘s a necessary technology but must be powered by renewables to make sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, that’s essentially my point. DAC just introduces an unnecessary step to the process, which will result in some efficiency loss. Not releasing CO2 in the first place (by using renewables) should always be preferable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It has to go farther than that. Not producing CO2 is the bare minimum, we also need to take measures to remove it as much as we are able

permalink
report
parent
reply

The memes of the climate

!climatememes@lemmy.world

Create post

The climate of the memes of the climate!

Planet is on fire!

mod notice: do not hesitate to report abusive comments, I am not always here.

rules:

  • no slurs, be polite

  • don’t give an excuse to pollute

  • no climate denial

  • and of course: no racism, no homophobia, no antisemitism, no islamophobia, no transphobia

Community stats

  • 74

    Monthly active users

  • 97

    Posts

  • 171

    Comments

Community moderators