You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
5 points
*

Wonder if federated youtube would work where people host their own content or join up to get a server as a group. That way the home videos nobody watches would not take up the space while big shots need to get better servers to support the view counts.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

This is what I advocate for. The caveat, but also the reason it will work (accordig to me) is that it’s not monetised.

There would thus also not be very many dopamine videos (or ragebait etc), those are made to make money.

Also, if it isn’t for making money, then the scope is no longer a big problem (you don’t need the “line to go up” and get “more followers”) and distribution becomes much simpler.

I’ll gladly share a bunch of videos to see how it could function, I have a 0.7Gb up but can easily switch to a 10Gb up.

Thoughts?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Enshittification

!enshittification@lemmy.world

Create post

What is enshittification?

The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source

The lifecycle of Big Internet

We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.

Embrace, extend and extinguish

We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.

Community stats

  • 2.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 84

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments

Community moderators