Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-6 points

You are describing intentional misgendering. That’s against our instance rules, so make sure you use preferred pronouns for folks who display them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Can using neutral pronouns be misgendering? I was always under the impression that they’re universally applicable regardless of the other person’s gender

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes, if you are aware of someone’s preferred pronouns and choose to ignore them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

It’s arguably ignoring their preferences, but how is it misgendering? they/them is gender neutral-- it implies nothing about their gender at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Consider the scenario where you meet a man. You know his name is Bradley (either through mutual friends or whatever), but he introduces himself as Alex. You can call him Bradley, and it would be technically correct, but it would be slightly rude when he has explicitly given his preferred name as Alex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I don’t think that’s quite right. It’s more like referring to him by another title such as “a friend of mine” or “a guy I met at the mall yesterday” etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s a false equivalence. A name is a unique identifier while pronouns serve only a mechanical linguistic purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I would argue calling all they/them is the opposite of misgendering. “They” has no gender. It is neuter.

“Intentional non-gendering” seems sensible and inoffensive. No chance of misgendering anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I have met one person (in real life) who uses she/he pronouns. I asked if I can call her they and she said no. I don’t know what to make of this, personally, as I’m unable to understand it, but I do try to abide by her request. I suspect she is an outlier though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m a gender abolitionist philosophically, so I get what you are saying and I would also prefer for everyone to agree to adopt using gender neutral language and be done with it. But we should still respect the preferred pronouns of others, because it isn’t up to you or me to force that choice on everyone else. It’s not much different from a Republican (for example) refusing to use she/her towards a trans woman. For some folks their pronouns are super important to them, so imo it’s just disrespectful not to use them when they are stated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I always assumed “they” could be used no matter what?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 8.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 336K

    Comments