Republicans in Congress will try to pass a stopgap spending bill this week to avert a partial government shutdown and keep the government running through September, though they’ll need Democrats’ help to do it.

The 99-page stopgap spending bill, which House Republicans released over the weekend, is required since lawmakers haven’t made any progress conferencing the dozen annual government funding bills that were supposed to become law by Oct. 1.

The continuing resolution, the third since October, would fund the federal government for the rest of fiscal year 2025 — marking the first time since fiscal 2013 that Congress has leaned on stopgap spending bills for the entire year, according to a report from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
104 points

Dems should shut it down … but won’t. They could force Republicans to sign whatever legislation they want, they just need 2 voted to win … but the Dems are weak. We need a better class of liberal politicians.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Democratic representatives make more money in donations when there are more Republicans around making noise …

We need to fix the way we donate money to candidates 

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Honestly it should not even be legal to donate to politicians at all. There should only be publicly funded elections. Earn enough signatures to end up on a ballot, you get a budget that goes to helping you campaign, audited to ensure that it only gets used for purposes directly related to campaigning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well, all i am saying is that i can take a tax free gift of 100,000 USD per year, but i still have to inform the IRS who gave it to me and when. If I have to do that as a private citizen, politicians should have to do something similar with campaign donations, so i agree

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, but … the people that would make these changes are the ones that benefit from how they work now. We need another branch of government, one with no power over normal citizens, but able to investigate corruption in politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

There’s no practical way to do this.

There’s nothing stopping people of influence (the wealthy, social media influencers, etc.) from endorsing a candidate on their own. Attempting to do so would violate free speech rights. And gee, which candidates do you think they’re going to endorse? The ones who pay them.

It would open the floodgates to even worse corruption than we see now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Cap them at 2k. Best of luck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Can I do multiple 2k donations? if not what decides a “separate entity” in the donations because if this isn’t addressed it might just be more paperwork and not do anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

We need a better class of liberal politicians.

That’s called “leftist.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

No, we need democrats that move to the center but avoid the billionaires. Which is basically impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

No, we need democrats that move to the center

Correct – to the left of where they are now.

Seriously: the Democrats are indeed liberal, which is a right-wing economic philosophy, and that’s a big part of the problem. The whole debate over “woke” (social “liberalism”) is nothing but a fucking distraction; the real reason the Democrats are losing is that they refuse to address wealth inequality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

And when it’s shut down, we should have a general strike. And the condition for ending the shutdown should be the immediate defunding and permanent removal of DOGE. And Trump should be made to wear a clown suit with a sign around his neck saying PUTIN’S BITCH.

(A boy can dream).

We need a better class of liberal politicians.

We need social democrats or people to the left of them. And most of all, people with backbone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unfortunately, we have the results of “vote blue no matter who” instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The flip side is that if the Dems shut it down, the republicans will use that as a scapegoat for all their failures and, truth be damned, their base will eat it up. It’s not an enviable position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Republicans have the majority. It’s Republicans who are blocking the spending bill. This has nothing to do with Democrats other than attempt by the mainstream media to make it seem like it will be Democrats fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The average voter won’t know that. They will see the upcoming recession and they will be told it was caused by Biden and dems government shutdown so that is what they will believe.

And the GOP will have a scapegoat for their recession and be able to continue crashing the economy without getting any blame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If you’re fucked for agreeing, and equally fucked amongst the same populace for disagreeing, there’s not a lot of downsides going for the “shut it down” plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Wait a sec. We know the GqP doesn’t care if the government burns, becauae that just hurts the poors, but the rest of government has things to do and provides essential services.

You want the Dems to burn it too, like some brinkmanship?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe it would actually make lazy americans do something about the coup

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 541K

    Comments