cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27121839

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

The larger diameter of the original can plus the angled transition at either end probably means same surface area of aluminium. Small diameter differences make larger circumferential changes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They do, but overall the can end (lid) is a LOT more aluminum than you expect and the whole rest of it isn’t as much as you expect.

So a little less lid is worth a fair bit more sidewall in terms of weight of aluminum

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Since they apparently have the same volume, could one of you be a hero and steal one of each and weigh them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If I still worked where I used to I 100% would. No cans around me now :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Aren’t these the same lid?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I guess I’m a bit rusty, so I am not sure at 355ml and the skinny profile if you can get a 202 end can, or have to use a 200

Hard to tell if it’s sleek or slim

Edit: Actually no, that’s a 200 not a 202. Look at the profile around the tab.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments