You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

I think the mirror universe arc was the best. The idea of going into the far future was good, if poorly executed. I also worry they’ve written themselves into a corner now. It’s going to restrict any media set post TNG but pre Discovery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s no more limiting to TNG era stories than the TNG era itself was to TOS era stories. They can’t blow up the Earth or genocide any major races, but beyond that we’ve been given very little information about any character’s future. I didn’t find Star Trek VI any less exciting because I knew the Klingon empire would still be around 80 years later, and I’d say SNW is flourishing under far tighter restrictions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think the mirror universe arc was the best.

As someone who enjoyed S1 the most, I completely agree. The closest trek yet came to “prestige” and then it slipped away :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Don’t worry. I’m sure Michael Burnham will come back somehow and help the writers get out of their block.

The mirror universe arc was, IMHO, when Georgio was at her most interesting and I also liked it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not really. That’s a 700 year gap. A LOT can happen in 700 years; Star Trek itself was only set 300 years in the future when it was released.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I see it as freeing: they can have any major event shift the timeline and move Discovery into being merely one possible future instead. No need to constrain themselves to some of the show’s more questionable moves.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Risa

!risa@startrek.website

Create post

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on’n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don’t break the weather control network.

Community stats

  • 980

    Monthly active users

  • 2.4K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments