Canada’s largest Muslim organisation is outraged over a bill introduced by the Quebec government that would ban headscarves for school support staff and students.

“In Quebec, we made the decision that state and the religion are separate,” said Education Minister Bernard Drainville, CBC News reported. “And today, we say the public schools are separate from religion.”

But the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), who are challenging in the Supreme Court the original bill that forbids religious symbols being worn by teachers, say the new bill is another infringement on their rights and unfairly targets hijab-wearing Muslims.

“This renewed attack on the fundamental rights of our community is just one of several recent actions taken by this historically unpopular government to bolster their poll numbers by attacking the rights of Muslim Canadians,” the NCCM said in a social media post.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

Women can make that decision for themselves, individually, based on what they are comfortable with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Ah yes, because muslim family units are beacons of freedom, self-expression and feminism. No threats of shunning or violence, ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How this going to fix things the women may just start wearing it outside of schools?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It gives them a secular place to grow interpersonally and develop their critical thinking skills without a literal shroud of dogma over their eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Trying to moral high ground about violence in 2025

https://youtu.be/16QCQU-jp4Q

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Great non-sequitor. You’re clearly not obsessed with a certain topic and shoving it into every unrelated conversation, are you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

These can’t. Ask their owner, i mean dad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just like the women in Iran/Afghanistan. They can do whatever they want there. Put on a bikini, shorts etc. Totally free to do what their husbands tell them to. Maybe I’ll send my two daughters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or if they want to get dragged back to a country where they can be stoned to death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What does this even mean? A woman whose family is going to bring her back to their native country for punishment often does so because she won’t wear a covering, which this law will support by forcing women not to cover. A woman who does wear a covering (forced or otherwise) probably won’t be, so your argument doesn’t even make sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bombed to death by American planes you mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.6K

    Posts

  • 77K

    Comments

Community moderators