During Tuesday’s hearing, Gabbard told Warner that the Signal thread didn’t share any classified information but refused to share its contents, or even admit that she was on the chain.

“If it’s not classified, share the texts now,” Warner told Gabbard. “Share it with the committee. You can’t have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is our national security.”

Bitch, we can smell the bullshit 500 miles away.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

Umm. What? No. Seriously. Wtf mate?!?

I think mass murder is despicable. Considering the US government had engaged in large scale extra judicial killings for decades (whether red or blue, no fucking difference), my country disgusts me. But, are you legit saying doing so incompentently is the problem? Not the murder. The incompetence.

Touch grass, god damn weirdo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

But, are you legit saying doing so incompentently is the problem? Not the murder. The incompetence.

Uh… No? I’m mad that Americans seem to be more mad that the mass murder is being done incompetently than about the mass murder itself. It’s like competent mass murder is acceptable but bad ospec is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well now I’m mad that you seem to be more mad about how people on social media react to bad opsec than the mass murder itself. It’s like mass murder is acceptable but reacting the wrong way to bad opsec is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

You’re being disingenuous and you know it. In the context of mass murder, bad opsec is a good thing and not something to be mad at to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I cannot fathom how you arrive at such a conclusion. Like, I figure you know not to trust the “news” anymore; but, dude, don’t trust the media?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I’m not sure why you’re assuming I’m MAGA (or even remotely rightwing), but either way I’m not getting this from the news or any other media; I’m arriving at this conclusion from the reactions of people right here on the Fediverse. Like seriously, compare the outrage at the leak to the outrage (or lack thereof) when Trump announced he was back to bombing Yemen. Everyone has been angrily criticizing the Trump admin for being incompetent and I’ve only seen one person say anything about how that’s better than if they were competently murdering people on the other side of the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 564K

    Comments