I can restore it. They’re not banned though

Why would a lesbian not be considered as “women-identifying”?

That’s what I was trying to ask. The question of theirs was about getting together with women. We do that too, not just men. A random person’s reminder about it being a community only for us in response to a recommendation does not mean the original asker isn’t one thing or another thing. Both people had hinted elsewhere about gender identity, but not in the way brought up.

It’s obvious that the removed comment was ironic. I suspect that you reported this comment, and that the mod only saw the comment without the context and removed it.

I promise you I did not see it until after. Those suspicions, similar to all the suspicions of me being one person or another (this seems to be a very phantom habit of people, to suspect I did or am something), I have faith can be dissuaded by asking their mods. Ironically I’ve been trying to advocate for a fix for this very type of thing for reasons like this.

You’ve been banned from lemmy.balahaj.zone, a bunch of communities from LW, and lemmy.dbzer0.com: https://lemm.ee/modlog?userId=476956

Your most recent comment here seems to indicate you are indeed trying to abuse people: https://lemm.ee/comment/19316780

I was not banned anywhere else for the same reason though, not that I was even banned from all those places (which was talked about at various times). I wasn’t referring to them, I was referring to the ban that just happened. The one marked with the words “history of abusing people”. The latter community you mentioned got rid of me due to a feud that went back to me trying to enforce rules regarding advocacy of death, which they didn’t like. To demonstrate how serious LW is about keeping communities safe from that, much of LW later got rid of me because they thought other things I’ve said was advocating death. The person who was trying to accelerate this, ironically the same person who was trying to shout to the world out of spite (to get back at me, for completely unrelated, year-old reasons they have been acting on for all that time) that I had any history saying anything indicating transphobia (while convincing everyone to ignore that me and the victim made up and that the slanderer in question is being transphobic against), was banned for their own crusade (is that worth mentioning), and in a way which extends to the whole service it would seem. It’s their words, themselves taken out of context, which turned into my random ban from a random community for women, because the person who banned me was an onlooker making assumptions, just as I am accused of being, so when I saw that even the person in charge might be dubious, and that they used the reason “not a woman” on the other two individuals, I said the words “it depends on what you mean”, because it comes off as transphobic to at least anyone who isn’t identifying as a guy, and again, the instance’s rules come to mind. That is all. I don’t know why that one sentence comes off as abusive, and I’d encourage you to ask the community if they allow male-to-female individuals, a part of my judgment being that the other peoples’ bans beg the question of transition being ruled out and that, again, I was banned for reasons that indicate this particular community should care but where everything else questions that, one whose promotion came off as selective considering the circumstances and considering who else would have wanted a community promotion but couldn’t get one.